Counting calories has always been the go-to method for individuals aiming to lose weight. However, it is often seen as a time-consuming and disappointing process. In recent years, an alternative approach called intermittent fasting has gained popularity, with its most common variation being time-restricted eating. But is intermittent fasting really more effective than calorie counting for weight loss? A recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine sought to answer this question by comparing the two methods.
The year-long study conducted at the University of Illinois Chicago involved 90 adults with obesity between the ages of 18 and 65. These participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a time-restricted eating group, a daily calorie restriction group, and a control group. The time-restricted eating group had to consume all their calories between noon and 8 pm, while the daily calorie restriction group had to reduce their calorie intake by 25% by closely monitoring their diet. The control group maintained their normal eating patterns.
In the first six months, both the time-restricted eating group and the daily calorie restriction group lost approximately 5% of their initial body weight. To sustain this weight loss, the diets were adjusted accordingly over the next six months. The time-restricted eating group extended their eating window to ten hours (10 am to 8 pm), while the daily calorie restriction group increased their calorie intake to match their requirements. The control group continued their regular eating pattern.
The study examined the effects of these diets on body composition, waist circumference, and various health markers and found that both approaches were equally effective for weight loss. After 12 months, participants in both groups lost about 4% of their starting body weight. Both diets also resulted in reduced waist circumference and fat mass to a similar extent. It was interesting to note that despite the different approaches, the calorie intake was reduced to a similar extent with both methods.
One notable point is that no significant changes were observed in health markers such as glucose, insulin, or cholesterol levels. This could be because the time-restricted eating window used in the study (12 pm to 8 pm) was considered more acceptable for participants. However, previous studies have suggested that an early time-restricted eating window (e.g., 8 am to 4 pm) can lead to greater weight loss and improved blood glucose regulation. The reason behind this is still not fully understood, but research suggests that our metabolism is more efficient earlier in the day, aligning with our natural waking and sleeping patterns.
These findings support previous studies comparing time-restricted eating and other forms of intermittent fasting, such as the 5:2 diet, to daily calorie restriction. The key factor in weight loss, regardless of the method used, is calorie restriction. Furthermore, the study highlighted the racial diversity of the participants, with 79% being black or Hispanic, making the results more applicable to a wider population.
It is important to note that participants in both dietary intervention groups received significant counseling throughout the study, including guidance on healthy eating and cognitive behavioral therapy to reduce impulse eating. This counseling may have played a significant role in helping participants resist the urge to consume high-calorie foods after completing their fasting window. As a result, it is unclear whether the effectiveness of time-restricted eating and daily calorie restriction alone can be solely attributed to these interventions, or if professional support with healthy eating is necessary for success.
Interestingly, another recent study found that time-restricted eating without additional support did not lead to weight loss after three months. Additionally, there were notable variations in weight loss among individual participants on each diet, suggesting that certain factors may make time-restricted eating or daily calorie restriction more effective for some individuals than others. Therefore, it is important to acknowledge that weight loss is undoubtedly challenging, regardless of the method employed. While intermittent fasting, specifically time-restricted eating, has shown promise for weight loss, individual outcomes may vary, and the exact reasons behind these variances remain unknown.
The question of whether intermittent fasting is more effective than calorie counting for weight loss has been addressed by a recent study. The study found that both approaches can be equally effective if undertaken with professional counseling. However, it is important to recognize the potential role of counseling and the individual variances in outcomes. While intermittent fasting may offer a simpler option for individuals aiming to reach a healthy weight, further research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms and factors that contribute to its effectiveness.
Leave a Reply